[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: licensing and lawyers
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: licensing and lawyers
- From: Adele_Bane-1@sbphrd.com
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:07:23 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm compelled to respond to the posting by Pam Matthews which stated in part: "our Finance and Administration officers are now noticing that lawyers' time doesn't come cheap and are thinking about not having any agreements reviewed by counsel. They don't seem to think they'll get sued -- after all, no one has yet, right?" I would suggest you refer them to this recent Philadelphia Inquirer article: Unlicensed-software claim is costly to Temple Philadelphia Inquirer, March 3, 2000, C1-2 According to the Inquirer, Temple University has agreed to pay $100,000 to settle claims that unlicensed software had been installed on campus computers. Temple is not admitting to copyright infringement, but is paying "to avoid the time and expense of protracted litigation." The claim against Temple was brought forward by the Business Software Alliance, a nonprofit organization that polices software licensing and piracy, based on a tip on it's antipiracy hot line. According to an Alliance spokesperson, Temple is not alone receiving such fines. Other educational institutions to pay these settlements include: -Berks Technical Institute: $102,500 in April, 1998 -Los Angeles Unified School District: $300,000 In our corporate environment, we routinely have a lawyer review database and ejournal contracts to verify, among other things, the "permitted uses" of the content. The digital environment has increased the protectionist feelings of content providers, and we are being safe as opposed to the alternative. Good luck with your campaign. You are totally justified in your concerns. Adele Bane, Senior Librarian SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals R&D pmatthew@gettysburg.edu on 09-Mar-2000 18:06 Please respond to liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu To: liblicense-l cc: (bcc: Adele Bane-1/CIS/PHRD/SB_PLC) Subject: licensing and lawyers Hi, everyone. I attended the ARL licensing seminar last May. The presenters (all of whom are VERY good) put the fear of God into me about signing off on licenses that leave the college vulnerable to breach-of-contract lawsuits and/or don't give the college its full rights under Fair Use guidelines. The presenters impressed upon us that the best way to make sure that a license is watertight is to have a lawyer and a librarian BOTH review it. Therefore, I've been working to get a system in place to do just that. However, our Finance and Administration officers are now noticing that lawyers' time doesn't come cheap and are thinking about not having any agreements reviewed by counsel. They don't seem to think they'll get sued -- after all, no one has yet, right? So, I have a two fold question: 1) How does your institution handle the negotiation and review of license agreements? 2) Do you know of any lawsuits or other problems arising from breaches? Thanks VERY much for your help on this! Pam ____________________________ Pam Matthews Acquisitions/Serials Librarian Musselman Library Gettysburg College Gettysburg, PA 17325 717-337-7007 (phone) ** 717-337-6666 (fax) pmatthew@gettysburg.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: digest 388
- Next by Date: RE: licensing and lawyers
- Prev by thread: licensing and lawyers
- Next by thread: RE: licensing and lawyers
- Index(es):