[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sage titles
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Sage titles
- From: W Holder <holder@library.utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:51:00 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I completely agree with you . My whine is at the moment with publishers
such as Sage, I don't get a choice.
Warren Holder
Electronic Information Resources Co-ordinator
University Of Toronto Libraries
Toronto, Ontario CANADA
telephone : (416) 978-2286
fax : (416) 978-7653
e-mail : Holder@library.utoronto.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: Carolyn Kacena [SMTP:Carolyn_Kacena@tamu-commerce.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 3:21 PM
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: RE: Sage titles
I believe that the size of the institution and its local technical
infrastructure make these choices extremely variable. At a mid-size
regional public university we prefer to use a minimum set of
intermediaries or the global publisher sets (e.g. Ideal, Muse) or JSTOR to
provide full image journals ... yes, there are multiple interfaces and,
yes, there are additional costs for the third party support, but it is
support we could not provide to ourselves alone. At least both publisher
and local library get some commitment to archiving the issues at the third
party host as part of the deal.
Carolyn Kacena, Director (903)886-5716
Gee Library (903)886-5723 (fax)
Texas A&M University-Commerce
P.O. Box 3011 Carolyn_Kacena@tamu-commerce.edu
Commerce, TX 75429-3011
- Prev by Date: Re: Sage titles
- Next by Date: RE: Reed Elsevier Law suit.
- Prev by thread: Re: Sage titles
- Next by thread: Sence of Worth
- Index(es):
