Previous by Date Index by Date
Threaded Index
Next by Date


Previous by Thread Next by Thread


Non-disclosure, again

You'll think that I'm obsessed with non-disclosure (maybe so) but I had
occasion last night to read a contract with non-disclosure language that
seemed sensible to me.  Isthe sort of language that some electronic
publishers/vendors who ask for non-disclosure say that they cannot
provide, i.e., a statement of exactly what is disclosable and what isn't. 

In this case, the format of the contract looks like this: 

In the body of the conract is a separate clause called "Confidential
Information."  It reads in part: 

During the course of this Agreement, each party may be given access to
confidential information.  The parties agree to the terms and conditions
of the Mutual Nondisclosure Agreement to be executed concurrently herewith
and set for as Exhibit C. 

(What I like here is the notion that each party *may* be given access to
confidential information -- not that it necesarily is, or that the whole
contract is to be non-disclosed.)

Then, Exhibit C begins:  "In order to __________, the parties may be
required to divulge or make available to each other certain information
and material that may be highly confidential, secret, private, and/or
proprietary. The Parties will disclose such information in accordance with
the terms and conditions set forth below." 

Then, the specific items requested are inventions that haven't been
written up in the literature:

enginnering/technical/product/design specifications

any device/machine/process/manufacture, r&d engineering items, computer
programs, source code, microcode, business plans

supplier lists, information regarding legal or business affairs of the
licensor

This is for a resource we will be running locally and it comes with
various softwares, etc.  Some of the restrictions may be over-broad (we
have yet to sort through them in detail), but in general, if
non-disclosure is requested, being specific about what is NOT to be
disclosed is the right way to do it.  Or so I think... 

Comments?


Ann Okerson
Ann.Okerson@yale.edu



http://www.library.yale.edu/liblicense
© 1996, 1997 Yale University Library
Please read our Disclaimer
E-mail us with feedback