Re: Future of the "subscription model?"

[Sean Johnson Andrews <sean.johnson.andrews@gmail.com>]

On 10/25/11 7:17 PM, "Mark Kurtz" <mkurtz@arl.org> wrote:

> Is it possible that the more interesting question is whether it 
> ought to be, from a public-good perspective?
>
> That would require a new economic settlement for scholarly 
> communications, of course. But history is full of new economic 
> settlements--some more painful and some less, some more 
> successful and some less.

An eminent domain for intellectual property of the scholarly 
variety, for instance.

sean