[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post Brussels : Elsevier and Australian STM debate 'sprouts'
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Post Brussels : Elsevier and Australian STM debate 'sprouts'
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:38:35 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Anthony Watkinson says: heavy technology items like manuscript submission systems have added to the editorial costs http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0703/msg00052.html Perhaps this was true a few years ago - but no longer! There is now free, open source software, such as Open Journal Systems: http://pkp.sfu.ca/?q=ojs Plus, highly affordable hosting and support options, such as the services provide by the Scholarly Exchange, who provides a free first year and second-year hosting at $750 US per year. Scholarly Exchange also offers a revenue sharing advertising option, which means that journals can actually earn revenue from being hosted at Scholarly Exchange: http://www.scholarlyexchange.org/ Heather Morrison
- Prev by Date: Re: Post Brussels : Elsevier and Australian STM debate 'sprouts'
- Next by Date: Update on usage statistics for informaworld
- Previous by thread: Re: Post Brussels : Elsevier and Australian STM debate 'sprouts'
- Next by thread: Re: Post Brussels : Elsevier and Australian STM debate 'sprouts'
- Index(es):