[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Economics of open access publishing



Fred -- I think there is some confusion here. The article is definitely accessible. You can click on the URL below, or if that doesn't work for you, then go to the home page of SERIALS. There, click on the journal title at the top of the page. This click will take you to a listing of volumes from 8 (1995) to date. Then click on the most recent (March 2006) and look for the author's name -- click on the article for a very nice full text presentation. We have no subscription to this title but I had no trouble with access from my machine at work or from my home machine.

Ann Okerson/Yale Library
Moderator, liblicense-l


On Mon, 8 May 2006, "FrederickFriend" wrote:

As this article appears to be available only on subscription, it is difficult to assess the value of research we cannot read, but I make the following points:

1. What the author of this article appears to have done is to compare a selection of open access publication charges with a selection of the costs of the present subscription system, i.e. comparing some publishers' OA charges with library subscription payments, which of course are only a part of the cost of the subscription system.

2. I am also not sure whether the author has used accurate figures on the number of articles for which CERN funding would be used, as research undertaken at CERN is funded by many institutions across the world. A total picture of particle physics research across the world and the cost of disseminating that research would give a more accurate picture.

3. The article appears only to cover costs without any assessment of economic or academic benefits from either the subscription or the OA model. On the issue of large versus small institutions, for example, even if the costs of OA are higher (unproven from what I can assess of this article) the benefits will also be correspondingly higher.

Fred Friend
JISC Scholarly Communication Consultant
Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL
E-mail ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Davis" <pmd8@cornell.edu>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:06 AM
Subject: Economics of open access publishing

Economics of open access publishing
Magaly Bescones Dominguez
Serials - 19(1), March 2006
http://serials.uksg.org/openurl.asp?genre=3Darticle&issn=3D0953-0460&volume=
=3D19&issue=3D1&spage=3D52

In this new article published in Serials, the author calculated the article
costs under two Open Access models: (1) Simple model -- the publisher's
costs are covered by a single source, and (2) Hybrid model -- the
publisher's costs are covered by a complex combination of two (or more)
elements, such as the payment by the author, subscription fees, the
institution=92s affiliation, etc.

"The results shown in Table 4 are very clear. Publication costs
for CERN under the IOP open access model would be at least nine
times more expensive than the current subscription fee of JHEP."
(p. 56), and

"the publication cost for CERN under Springer Open Choice model
would be at least five times more expensive than the current
subscription fee" (p. 57).  These results were also confirmed by
the PLoS model.  The author concludes from her analysis that, "in
general, the open access models available would be more expensive
for CERN than the cost of periodical subscriptions." (p. 57)
[SNIP]