[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Access vs copyleft ?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Open Access vs copyleft ?
- From: "MARCO MARANDOLA" <marandol@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:45:20 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear all, I am having a discussion with some expert friends on this subject: Is the Open Access part of the copyleft movement? In favor: the definition of copyleft as making a work free, the author allowed some uses without any remuneration or authorization. In Contra: The Open Access is only at accademic level. Personally I am in favor, but I am very courious about your opinion (even in pivayte if you want). Than I will make a short summary of all the answers. Thank You very much for any contribution. LLMM Marco Marandola international copyright expert IFLA CLM ICOM CLM
- Prev by Date: Google Scholar to Integrate with NIH PubMed Central (a will)
- Next by Date: Woodhead Publishing commences publishing journals from The Textile Institute
- Previous by thread: Google Scholar to Integrate with NIH PubMed Central (a will)
- Next by thread: Woodhead Publishing commences publishing journals from The Textile Institute
- Index(es):