[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Excellent article (Worlock)

To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Subject: RE: Excellent article (Worlock)
From: Jan Velterop <velterop@biomedcentral.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:23:18 EST
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

'Davis' (sic) Warlock. Freudian slip? (It is not Joe's fault; it's in the
original).

Jan Velterop

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu]On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito
> Sent: 02 November 2004 22:07
> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Subject: Excellent article (Worlock)
> 
> 
> This article by Davis Worlock may be old news to many members of this
> list.  It was just brought to my attention this week by Chuck Hamaker.
> 
> Open Access: Free for All -- or More Expensive for Everyone
> 
> http://charlestonco.com/features.cfm?id=169&type=ed
> 
> Joe Esposito

Prev by Date: Re: MPLC licenses
Next by Date: Scientific Publications: Free for all - House of Commons Report Due8 November
Previous by thread: Excellent article (Worlock)
Next by thread: MPLC licenses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread