[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license

To: <marilyn.geller@configuredinfo.com>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Subject: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
From: "Doina Farkas" <DFARKAS@library.unt.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:28:57 EST
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

Some states do not permit keeping a confidendiality clause in their
contracts.  One of them is Texas.

We were able to have it removed from the AMIGOS negotiated contract.  In
the case of AMIGOS (consortial) contracts, each institution must still
make additional changes addressing each institution's requirements, as
AMIGOS does not have signatory authority on behalf of its member
institutions.

Doina G. Farkas
Head, Contracts and Development Office
Univ. of North Texas Libraries
P.O. Box 305190
Denton, TX 76210
Voice Mail:  (940) 565-2608
Fax:  (940) 369-8760
E-Mail:  DFarkas@library.unt.edu

Prev by Date: SAGE Publications Policy for RoweCom Customers
Next by Date: Re: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
Previous by thread: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
Next by thread: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread