RE: Canada-Federal court rules law books' copyright infringed by libraries'

["Deborah A. Fleming" <dfleming@alliant.edu>]

This may not matter from the standpoint of whether they are infringing or
not, but are they charging and making a profit, or just charging for the
actual costs of the photocopying.  Don't think that difference helped
Kinko's much, when they were on the hot seat, but I am curious.

Deborah A. Fleming
Outreach Services Librarian
Alliant International University
San Diego, CA

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamaker, Chuck
Subject: Canada-Federal court rules law books' copyright infringed by
libraries'

Canada: Publishers' licence bid gets boost
By CAROLINE ALPHONSO AND PAUL WALDIE, Globe and Mail.com, May 16, 2002 -
Print Edition, Page B2
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/printarticle/gam/20020516
/RLAWW

Federal court rules law books' copyright infringed by libraries'
photocopying

By CAROLINE ALPHONSO AND PAUL WALDIE

Legal publishers hope they can use a recent federal court ruling to stop
law libraries across the country from photocopying and charging fees for
parts of law books without a licence agreement. In a 132-page decision
released on Tuesday, the Federal Court of Appeal said the Law Society of
Upper Canada -- the governing body of Ontario lawyers -- had infringed
copyrights of three legal publishers by selling their work without a
licence. The publishers included CCH Canadian Ltd., Canada Law Books Inc.
and Carswell, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd. "I expect that this ruling
will be a wake-up call to anyone who is infringing on copyright," Ian
Rhind, president of CCH Canadian, said yesterday.

Noted in  DIGITAL-COPYRIGHT Digest 92